CCAC to Review 2026 Semiquincentennial Dime, Quarter, and Half Dollar Designs

5

CCAC logoThe Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) will hold a two-day public meeting on Oct. 15 and 16 to review and discuss candidate designs for several 2026-dated coins celebrating the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding. These designs include semiquincentennial-themed dimes, quarters, and half dollars. Additionally, candidate designs for the Proof American Platinum Eagles for 2026, 2027, and 2028 (Charters of Freedom series) will be considered.

The CCAC is tasked with advising the Secretary of the Treasury on themes and designs pertaining to all United States coins and medals.

As part of the celebration of the semiquincentennial founding of America in 2026, the U.S. Mint will issue one-year-only redesigned circulating coins and offer "Best of the Mint" gold coins and silver medals. Semiquincentennial designs for the cent and nickel have already been recommended. The "Best of the Mint" 2026 Semiquincentennial Gold Coins have also been reviewed.

Specifically, agenda topics for the CCAC meetings each day include:

October 15 – Day 1:

  • Review of candidate designs for the five Semiquincentennial Quarters.
  • Review of candidate designs for the 2026-2028 American Eagle Platinum Proof Coins.

October 16 – Day 2:

  • Review of candidate designs for the 2026 Semiquincentennial Dime.
  • Review of candidate designs for the 2026 Semiquincentennial Half Dollar.
  • Discussion and recommendations on all portfolios from October 15 and October 16.

CCAC Meeting Time and Public Viewing Options

The two-day meeting will take place on Oct. 15 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., and Oct. 16 from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. (ET).

Interested members may watch the meeting via live stream on the U.S. Mint’s YouTube Channel at:

https://www.youtube.com/​user/​usmint.

Members of the public can watch the meeting live by clicking on the "October 15, 2024" and "October 16, 2024" icons under the Live Tab.

For those in the public who wish to watch on-line, please note that remote access is solely for observation purposes. Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the CCAC’s consideration is invited to do so by emailing info@ccac.gov.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rick

Thanks for the fresh Monday morning article Mike! ⁠✯

CaliSkier

Rick, I just got off the phone with GC and there may be hope. The woman whom called, listened intently to my description of the scenario with your 2014 S Kennedy Half silver coin mislabeled by PCGS as being the 2014 D clad, 1 of 4, valued by PCGS at $3,500. She said to write a letter, describing details, which you described to us here on Coin News and submit, via e-mail to Great Collections Customer Support. It would indeed need to be approved by Ian or Raleen. I told them a friend had purchased this coin back in April,… Read more »

CaliSkier

Above typo: “The woman whom called, listened intently to my description of the scenario with your 2014 S Kennedy Half silver coin mislabeled by PCGS as being the 2014 D clad, 1 of 4, valued by PCGS at $3,500. ”
Meant and said on the call, “your 2014 D Kennedy Half silver coin mislabeled by PCGS”

Rick

Cali,
Wow that’s some hopeful information, and thank you very much!
My plan was to contact them this week, and since you put a bug in their ear about my dilemma, that can only help!
Much appreciated for your caring and your persistence!
Did you, or do you remember who the person was that you were talking too by name?
I hope Ian and company can work some magic here, after all, PCGS is GC’s largest TPG partner, maybe they can work something out together!?!!
What you have done was very kind,
Thanks Cali!

CaliSkier

Whew, Rick.. do yourself a favor and if you haven’t called GC yet, you probably shouldn’t. Just compose your letter/e-mail and send to “customer support, attention: Raleen or Ian. The person I spoke with when I called back to get her name, seemed a little flustered and a bit annoyed. By me not having an item number to provide or an account as of yet with them, he was annoyed for sure. I’m leaving his name out of this due to trying to protect him from any unneeded or unwarranted scrutiny. He told me that he believed that it was… Read more »